I began as a designer. I know the obsessive joy of nudging pixels until they line up, rewriting copy until it breathes, shipping flows that most people never notice but quietly depend on. Years later, I moved into recruitment—a path that didn’t exist when I started. Suddenly I was on the other side of the table, helping leaders decide whose work even deserved a conversation.
Today, after a decade in this seat, I’ve built an unusual record: one out of every three designers I put forward gets hired. That success didn’t come from shortcuts or a secret algorithm. It came from failing often, recalibrating, and paying attention to the blind spots most hiring processes refuse to acknowledge.
And even with that track record, I’ll tell you this with confidence: design hiring remains broken.
The Portfolio Mirage
Most hiring managers still treat portfolios like gospel. A slick prototype, polished case studies, a confident narrative—and the candidate seems irresistible. But polish can hide the truth. Beautiful mockups don’t guarantee a shipped feature. They don’t show what broke in production, or how many compromises had to be made, or whether the designer solved the right problem.
Meanwhile, designers with quiet, even “boring” portfolios often get overlooked. Yet these are the people who untangle messy systems, make gnarly design systems coherent, and ship outcomes that transform revenue or retention. Hiring loops rarely pause to notice them.
When portfolios become theater, we reward style over substance.
What’s Missing: Proof
The signals that actually predict success are rarely asked for:
- Shipped work that survived real users.
- Evidence of tradeoffs made under pressure.
- Systems cleaned up and maintained long after the glamour faded.
- Collaborators who will vouch for decision-making and resilience.
- Outcomes—however small—that compounded into business impact.
Most interviews don’t probe these. They stop at the glossy story. Without evidence, hiring turns into educated guessing.
The Wrong Kind of Audition
Design tasks could be a chance to see judgment in action. Too often, they’re thinly disguised spec work. Candidates are asked to redesign entire flows for free, usually under conditions that don’t reflect reality.
Real design strength shows in tradeoffs: knowing what to sacrifice when time runs out, how to keep accessibility intact when resources are thin, when to push a stakeholder and when to yield. That’s what an assessment should reveal. Instead, we keep grading theater.
Bias at Every Turn
The other rot is bias. Big-name logos on a resume still open doors. Pedigree still outweighs practice. Names and photos still tilt first impressions. I’ve seen brilliant self-taught designers passed over, while average candidates from prestigious companies sail through.
When polish and pedigree are the filters, true talent slips through the cracks.
Hard Lessons Learned
After countless cycles of placements that worked—and painful ones that didn’t—here’s what I know for sure:
- Evidence outweighs aesthetics.
Shipped proof matters more than shiny decks. - Decision quality beats design quality.
The real skill is how designers choose under constraints. - Collaboration is the differentiator.
PMs and engineers often reveal more than a portfolio ever could. - Speed with integrity wins.
Designers who move fast without breaking trust become anchors for teams. - Bias distorts everything.
Blind reviews consistently surface stronger, more diverse candidates.
None of this is radical. But if it were obvious, design hiring wouldn’t still be stuck in the same loops.
The Quiet Truth
My one-in-three success rate isn’t magic. It’s simply the result of paying attention to what actually predicts success, instead of what dazzles in a slideshow.
The designers who thrive are rarely the loudest. They’re the ones who sweat the invisible details, who bring calm when launches catch fire, who make the boring systems reliable. Their portfolios may never win awards, but their work makes products better and teams stronger.
Until design hiring shifts from polish to proof, we’ll keep mis-hiring and undervaluing the very people who hold products together.
The future of design hiring isn’t about unicorns.
It’s about noticing the steady hands, the decision-makers, the people whose evidence speaks louder than their polish.
Leave a Reply